Am I being unreasonable? (I think not)
Jan. 5th, 2018 07:50 pmI was recently perusing the Marks and Spencer website in search of women's trousers.
Because, over the years, I have found that their women's trousers, short length, fit me and do not require me to turn up the hems so they do not trail along the ground.
And, admittedly, I am not madly taken by their current offerings, which are not particularly me, somehow.
But I daresay there would be something or other there that would be acceptable -
- except -
- they do not give any information as to whether the item in question has POCKETS and, as I am eschewing the carrying of bags on account of the neck and shoulder issues, I am done with trousers that do not have pockets.
One cannot always tell from the picture, and, even if they appear to have pockets, how am I to know whether they are real pockets or a design feature, a Potemkin pocket, a flap or a zip with nothing behind it?
Frustration, frustration, frustration.
no subject
Date: 2018-01-05 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-05 10:08 pm (UTC)I like their short leg length trousers too; my problem is that there's never enough in stock...
no subject
Date: 2018-01-05 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-05 11:07 pm (UTC)P.
no subject
Date: 2018-01-06 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2018-01-06 04:21 am (UTC)2) You have this in common with onyxlynx, who as a seamstress herself, sewed pockets into clothes that didn't have them.
I like them a lot and deprecate my pants without them, but I do wear some pants without them.
no subject
Date: 2018-01-06 11:41 am (UTC)I am not gifted enough with my needle to sew pockets into my clothes!
no subject
Date: 2018-01-08 09:01 pm (UTC)Me, I just thrifted a pair of Lee jeans that are definitely from the '90s. How can I tell? Not just the fit/cut, but the pockets, which go halfway down to the knees.