There is annoying WOEZ WOEZ PC article criticising the protest against pink girly Lego ('celebrating not architecture and action but beauty salons, cupcake bakeries and poodle parlours': pass me a sparkly pink sickbag) in today's Guardian.
It is particularly irksome because Hannah Betts goes ' the one area we should never seek to police is [children's] imaginations'.
How is this ghastly, from what I hear, practically universal gender essentialism in children's toys and other paraphernalia, not a mind-forg'd manacle upon their imaginations and sense of the acceptable and appropriate?
I don't think little girls should be forcibly prevented from indulging any taste for pastels and sparkles and ponies and fairy princesses (any more than little boys should).
I think they should be allowed to know that there are other options available and pink is not the only colour they are allowed.
***
And Amazon have actually sent me a promotional email for the notorious Bic for Her Amber Medium Ballpoint Pen pack. What fresh hell is this? Do they not get the mockery and sarcasm all over teh intahnetz?