And honestly, I find this discussion over at AITA so point thahr, misst.
Okay, yes, I think the whole thing of the family doing their best to erase his first wife, the child's mother, very, very creepy and inappropriate -
But mostly it seems to be people going OMG HE MARRIED HIS DECEASED WIFE'S SISTER????!!!!! HORRORZZZ
Going on like a load of Victorian woezerers...
Really, this used to be if, not very common, not uncommon, even if for a long time the relationship either had to be without benefit of clergy or undertaken abroad.
Mind you, I notice that commentators there often get very wound up about cousins marrying, yea, even unto the third and fourth degree. (Ahem ahem the Darwin/Wedgwood Dynasty.) I think assumptions being made about ease of exogamy in earlier phases of society...
***
In entirely other news, I virtually attended a seminar earlier this week and ventured a question, and lo, the speaker turned out to be a fellow-fan of early C20th gay pacifist male suffragist sex reformer and subsequently entered into correspondence.
Very niche fandom!
no subject
Date: 2022-06-10 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2022-06-10 12:39 pm (UTC)That is: the second cousin in question has sisters, he would never describe me as having been raised like their sister and neither would I (and neither would the sisters). What I was raised like was their cousin. If someone from a different cultural sphere needs to label that "like a sibling" in order to explain the familial bond/reaction, they're...well, wrong, actually. Being their cousin was culturally and personally important in itself.
no subject
Date: 2022-06-11 02:22 am (UTC)