oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)
Not for That City
By Charlotte Mew
Not for that city of the level sun,
Its golden streets and glittering gates ablaze—
The shadeless, sleepless city of white days,
White nights, or nights and days that are as one—
We weary, when all is said , all thought, all done.
We strain our eyes beyond this dusk to see
What, from the threshold of eternity
We shall step into. No, I think we shun
The splendour of that everlasting glare,
The clamour of that never-ending song.
And if for anything we greatly long,
It is for some remote and quiet stair
Which winds to silence and a space for sleep
Too sound for waking and for dreams too deep.
oursin: George Beresford photograph of the young Rebecca West in a large hat, overwritten 'Neither a doormat nor a prostitute' (Neither a doormat nor a prostitute)

‘There is joy, and there is rage’: the new generation of novelists writing about motherhood: not sure it's saying anything very remarkable, but I will give it massive kudos for actually acknowledging the history there:

Books about motherhood come in waves: the recent spate only the latest in a long line of literary endeavours. In the 1950s there was Shirley Jackson’s Life Among the Savages. The 1960s wave saw Margaret Drabble’s The Millstone and Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook, alongside Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique; the 1970s The Women’s Room by Marilyn French, Adrienne Rich’s Of Woman Born, and In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens by Alice Walker. In the 1980s writing about motherhood became even more transgressive and imaginative, with Beloved by Toni Morrison, The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood, and Nights at the Circus by Angela Carter. The early 2000s saw an explosion in nonfiction, including accounts by Rachel Cusk and Anne Enright. And on and on, up to the present day, where no matter how much is written about motherhood, it feels as though there is still more to say.

After so many pieces when it seems the writer thinks Nobody Ever Thought About This Before, I found this molto refreshing.

***

I am just a bit suspicious of the story of Tipu Sultan’s female entourage, untold for centuries on the grounds of 'untold by whom?' and maybe there is a rich oral or vernacular tradition there???

Says Howes, “The reports I’ve found were by British men, so when the women of Tipu’s court are discussed, you know it is because they were making a lot of trouble. That is what has made this project so interesting for me. We are helping them have their #MeToo moment.”

It's based on a document from the India Office Records in the British Library (this is not made entirely clear in the piece): these records are rich, but, obviously, one-sided. Still, of interest.

***

‘With Her Own Hair’: A Victorian Prisoner’s Art: Arrested over 400 times, Annie Parker found redemption in intricate cross-stitch and crochet using her own hair.:

Between her hairwork embroideries and her presence in workhouse records and newspapers from Kent, London and further afield, we know significantly more about Annie Parker than we do about many other late 19th-century women. It is clear that Parker had become an object of widespread fascination. But even with this surplus of information, we are left trying to find the ‘real’ Annie Parker, the one not sensationalised in newspapers as a ‘notorious woman’ described as having ‘“a screw loose somewhere,” and it seems […] to have been just where the alcohol goes to’. In print she is mythologised and sensationalised, her agency lost. In stitch we have not only her own words, but also a glimpse into how she expressed her emotions, passed the time, and perhaps found some peace behind prison bars.

***

Out in the open and not as confined as myth gives her out: Emily Dickinson’s Herbarium: A Forgotten Treasure at the Intersection of Science and Poetry.

***

Readers of Nancy Mitford will recall that one of Uncle Matthew's objections to peeresses sitting in the House of Lords was the vexed question of loos for the Ladies: here is a fascinating article about historical sanitary (it all sounds a leetle insanitary, no?) provision in the Houses of Parliament: The smallest room in the House.

oursin: My photograph of Praire Buoy sculpture, Meadowbrook Park, Urbana, overwritten with Urgent, Phallic Look (urgent phallic)

There was recently a post on AITA about a bloke who wanted to take his toddler son to a cabin of fond family memories on a remote island on a lake in Canada. This involves a journey that I do not think one would want to undertake singlehanded with a child of that age, a cabin rather lacking in amenities (which bloke has not, apparently, over the years, done much due diligence in upgrading, including ensuring clean water supply...), and distance from civilisation. Island has bats, which are a rabies vector (previous visitors have, indeed, had to go and have the full course of relevant injections).

Honestly mother's concerns did not seem dismissable as just about 'a few bugs' and excessive maternal anxieties, this seems over-investment in some kind of nostalgic fantasy .

Somehow this reminded of a recent entry in The Guardian's 'You Be The Judge' feature: Jordan wants a big dog, Jada says it won’t fit in with their city lifestyle. They live in a small flat in a European city:

I’d like a big dog, like a labrador or golden retriever. I’d train it, take it for walks and dedicate lots of time to generally loving it, as Jada and I work from home. I think we have a flexible routine right now, so in my opinion, a dog won’t really change that....

I could do the majority of the dog stuff in the day and she could take over for the evening walk. It would be perfect. There’s really nothing left to do except pop along to the local shelter and make ourselves known. I want to adopt, as it would be great to give a dog a home. Jada keeps stalling but I reckon I can persuade her. Once she’s looking into a dog’s pleading eyes, she won’t say no. Obviously there would be challenges around having a dog, but I’m not worried – I’m mentally prepared. The fact we travel a lot doesn’t bother me either. Dog sitters are cheap where we live, so a weekend here or there won’t set us back loads.

Dream on, Jordan. We note that he is the one talking about 'fun' and Jada is the one murmuring about vet bills and insurance.

I feel this also fits in here: Anne Enright on the problem with unrequited love, except it's actually about an older scruffy poet and a young woman whom he takes as his muse:

There is a kind of creepiness to all this too – as we now more easily intuit. The artist is almost entirely self-involved, his idealised muse may be admired, but she is also robbed of the right to be real....

She was flattered by the attentions of a poet and was kind to him, even when those attentions became onerous. As his biographer Antoinette Quinn writes, Kavanagh waited for her at certain times in the street, and sat watching her in cafes where she socialised with friends. “He came to know all her haunts and stalked her.”

To all appearances, Moriarty seemed to have the upper hand. Kavanagh may have been highly literate but he was uncouth and she tried to smarten him up a little (he had horrified another date by arriving smelly). In a joking article, Kavanagh described himself as an ill-kempt knight taken in hand by a lovely lady. This, according to Quinn was the kind of infantilism you might expect from a man who had lived with his mother until he was 35. It is a private emotional dependency “at odds with the misogyny he affected in his writings”. By the end of the year, Kavanagh, like the true stalker he was, ignored Moriarty’s attempts to rebuff him, and turned up when she was on dates with other men.... Back in the day, this shift from unwanted to malevolent attention was not called out, because unrequited love was all the rage.

oursin: Hedgehog saying boggled hedgehog is boggled (Boggled hedgehog)

Currently working on this rather short talk as part of panel I am supposed to be doing, in which I shall be saying something about Naomi Mitchison's Comments on Birth Control (1930) -

- a slim pamphlet (based on the talk she gave at the World Congress on Sexual Reform the previous year) published in Faber and Faber's 'Criterion Miscellany' series which:

consisted of short works (30 to 60 or so pages) by authors and public figures active in the late 1920s and early 1930s in the UK. It was an offshoot of the journal Criterion, edited by T.S. Eliot from 1922 to 1939.

and was likewise edited by Old Possum with the unofficial assistance of Herbert Read.

I cannot even. On the other paw, looking at the list of other titles and authors, they do include quite a few that one would not consider an obvious match with Eliot.

This article indicates that Mitchison had submitted directly to Faber and Faber and that TSE did not have much, if any, input.

But I sure do boggle because not only is it about contraception (and why it is still Not All That) but, being Our Naomi, not at all all about Ye Monogamous Marital Relationship...

I will also add here a delightful fact that I think is in June Rose's biography of Marie Stopes, that Marie sent her poetry to Eliot at Faber and received a polite rejection that it was not quite in line with what Faber was publishing, poesy-wise.

In related very niche Mitchisoniana, I was lately looking at the odd copies of a short-lived journal she was associated with at around the same time, and realised that I had acquired these at Quite A Snip for an assorted set, because looking it up on Bookfinder.com, individual odd copies (I was hoping to make up the complete run) go for more than I spent on that.

oursin: Cod with aghast expression (kepler codfish)

[A] film about the early career of the man who would go on to bag the prize of being anointed poet laureate.

You know, back in the days of my youth when I was somewhat beguiled by Robert Graves's essays, I seem to recall him being somewhat vicious about the very concept of Poet Laureate? or at least it was Death to the Poet's Spirit and Relationship to the Goddess/Muse?

But anyway, he was never actually Poet Laureate, so that's Codslap One.

There is a passing mention that Nancy Nicholson - that passionate feminist who kept her name on marriage - was an artist in her own right - but do we go eeeeeuuuuwww or what over this?

Graves and Nicholson had four children when Riding arrived in their household, but in the film they only have one. This was in part a pragmatic decision.... He didn’t have a huge budget to play with, “and if it had four children, I’d have to write something for them to do, so that was an economic decision”. But he admits that is not the only reason. In terms of the story, “I think, no matter what day and age we are in, a man leaving his wife with four children is a tough one to get sympathy for, and I wanted people to go along with Robert’s journey. It’s really a film about the power of creativity, and, you know, it all comes at a cost for any writer, painter or musician.”

We think that, actually, getting shot of Graves and his draaaama was a massive plus, and Nancy was probably dancing the Charleston as he left.

It also leaves him on a relatively high note of having having given All For Love and Poetry, and does not venture further into the toxic cesspit of the Graves/Riding/and assorted other people who were dragged into their mess in Mallorca.

Not to mention the bit where Riding drove the wife of the man she'd set her sights on into a psychiatric institution...

That, I guess, would be the horror movie? Graves' weirdo Goddess woo-woo would really fit with that.

In fact skips right over all that, though does mention

Graves continued to have his “muses” in New York, while married to Beryl. “I wonder whether [descendants of the second marriage] would have been as happy if I wanted to pursue that angle of an old man chasing young muses around in New York.”

Query: is Graves, as claimed, 'unfashionable'?

oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)

In an Artist's Studio
By Christina Rossetti

One face looks out from all his canvases,
One selfsame figure sits or walks or leans:
We found her hidden just behind those screens,
That mirror gave back all her loveliness.
A queen in opal or in ruby dress,
A nameless girl in freshest summer-greens,
A saint, an angel - ; every canvas means
The same one meaning, neither more or less.
He feeds upon her face by day and night,
And she with true kind eyes looks back on him,
Fair as the moon and joyful as the light:
Not wan with waiting, not with sorrow dim;
Not as she is, but was when hope shone bright;
Not as she is, but as she fills his dream.

O dear, yes, Ms Rossetti: one can tell that you had some acquaintance among the Pre-Raphaelites. Did they get it?

oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)
Badger
John Clare (1793-1864)

The badger grunting on his woodland track
With shaggy hide and sharp nose scrowed with black
Roots in the bushes and the woods, and makes
A great high burrow in the ferns and brakes.
With nose on ground he runs an awkward pace,
And anything will beat him in the race.
The shepherd's dog will run him to his den
Followed and hooted by the dogs and men.
The woodman when the hunting comes about
Goes round at night to stop the foxes out
And hurrying through the bushes to the chin
Breaks the old holes, and tumbles headlong in.
When midnight comes a host of dogs and men
Go out and track the badger to his den,
And put a sack within the hole, and lie
Till the old grunting badger passes bye.
He comes and hears—they let the strongest loose.
The old fox hears the noise and drops the goose.
The poacher shoots and hurries from the cry,
And the old hare half wounded buzzes bye.
They get a forked stick to bear him down
And clap the dogs and take him to the town,
And bait him all the day with many dogs,
And laugh and shout and fright the scampering hogs.
He runs along and bites at all he meets:
They shout and hollo down the noisy streets.
He turns about to face the loud uproar
And drives the rebels to their very door.
The frequent stone is hurled where e'er they go;
When badgers fight, then every one's a foe.
The dogs are clapt and urged to join the fray;
The badger turns and drives them all away.
Though scarcely half as big, demure and small,
He fights with dogs for bones and beats them all.
The heavy mastiff, savage in the fray,
Lies down and licks his feet and turns away.
The bulldog knows his match and waxes cold,
The badger grins and never leaves his hold.
He drives the crowd and follows at their heels
And bites them through—the drunkard swears and reels.
The frighted women take the boys away,
The blackguard laughs and hurries on the fray.
He tries to reach the woods, an awkward race,
But sticks and cudgels quickly stop the chase.
He turns again and drives the noisy crowd
And beats the many dogs in noises loud.
He drives away and beats them every one,
And then they loose them all and set them on.
He falls as dead and kicked by boys and men,
Then starts and grins and drives the crowd again;
Till kicked and torn and beaten out he lies
And leaves his hold and cackles, groans, and dies.
Some keep a baited badger tame as hog
And tame him till he follows like the dog.
They urge him on like dogs and show fair play.
He beats and scarcely wounded goes away.
Lapt up as if asleep, he scorns to fly
And seizes any dog that ventures nigh.
Clapt like a dog, he never bites the men
But worries dogs and hurries to his den.
They let him out and turn a harrow down
And there he fights the host of all the town.
He licks the patting hand, and tries to play
And never tries to bite or run away,
And runs away from the noise in hollow trees
Burnt by the boys to get a swarm of bees.

I feel Clare is a particularly appropriate poet to cite in present circumstances:

With an admiration of nature and an understanding of the oral tradition, but with little formal education.... born into a peasant family.... the work he did out of financial necessity consisted largely of manual labor such as gardening, ploughing, threshing, or lime-burning.

oursin: Photograph of Stella Gibbons, overwritten IM IN UR WOODSHED SEEING SOMETHIN NASTY (woodshed)

Book I am reading for review (which is v good, just saying, this is a relatively minor quibble due to angle it is taking on the events in question) is clearly finding it hard to get its head around the fact that a lawyer who was clearly and actively on the side of reforming the Sodomy Laws in the early C19th -

- nonetheless has been very strongly suspected of deploying the threat of disclosing allegations that Lord Byron inflicted sodomitical practices on his wife (this being just as capitally illegal at the time as male-male offences) in order to obtain, not just Lady Byron's legal separation from Lord B, but that custody of Ada was awarded to her (custody of children normally went to fathers, patriarchy ROOOLED).

He is known to have been Very Sympathetic to women in the matrimonial courts (such as they were) in the pre-1857 dispensation.

And okay, along with the 'men should not be punished for their innate dispositions', there was also a discourse of 'there is nothing wrong with loving married couples consensually exploring pleasures beyond the missionary position' among people interested in reforming the law (who were, true, a minority).

But I was sitting there going - 'Lord Byron - relationship to consent, just a leeetle problematic, huh, especially given contemporary attitudes to husband's rights over wife's body', even if there is still a school of thought that is, 'bet Annabella enjoyed it at the time'.

Yeah, while being obliged to live on civil terms not just with her husband and his frightening dark moods but with his partner in adulterous incest, I'm sure she was really up for exploring the wilder frontiers of erotic experience....

Women could not obtain divorces at the time (one did, pre 1857 but the circumstances were so unusual it was basically Albie the Yorkshire-dwelling albatross).

The laws were heavily weighted against women. One cannot really blame Annabella for not wanting to cede an infant daughter to Byron.

But none of the other grounds that I think we would now consider justification for dissolving a marriage - adultery, cruelty, and (at least suspicions of) insanity could be invoked. The best she could hope for was a legal separation, and custody.

Time, one thinks, to bring up the nuclear option, because nothing else was likely to get Byron to concede.

I think approaching the question from the 'awful choices women had under matrimonial law' angle puts a very different complexion on the choices made.

(The inequities of divorce law did not go away: I have the strongest suspicion that Marie Stopes lied like a rug to get her first marriage annulled in 1916, but her first husband was such a monster that I am still pretty much 'you go girl' at that high-risk strategy.)

oursin: Fotherington-Tomas from the Molesworth books saying Hello clouds hello aky (fotherington-tomas)

So, thinking about poems and poetry -

Okay, this is maybe not One of the Great Poems of All Time, and I'm not even sure it's one of my as it were poetic touchstones, but I am fond of it for an entirely adventitious reason, which is that I first heard it when my father used to quote the opening lines -

- slightly wrong, i.e. 'Beyond the East the mountains, beyond the West the sea/And East and West the wanderlust that will not let me be'.

But anyway, I eventually found the actual poem in an anthology somewhere - I'm not sure if it was actually in any of the various anthologies we had about the house:

Wander-thirst by Gerald Gould
BEYOND the East the sunrise, beyond the West the sea,
And East and West the wander-thirst that will not let me be;
It works in me like madness, dear, to bid me say good-bye;
For the seas call, and the stars call, and oh! the call of the sky!

I know not where the white road runs, nor what the blue hills are;
But a man can have the sun for a friend, and for his guide a star;
And there's no end of voyaging when once the voice is heard,
For the rivers call, and the roads call, and oh! the call of the bird!

Yonder the long horizon lies, and there by night and day
The old ships draw to home again, the young ships sail away;
And come I may, but go I must, and, if men ask you why,
You may put the blame on the stars and the sun and the white road and the sky.
Gould himself sounds like rather a good egg - hanging out with Lansbury and the Fabian set and Mrs Fawcett and the constitutional suffragists, and Victor Gollancz. I feel I should already know about him!

So I should - What that doesn't mention is that his wife was Barbars Ayrton Gould, the daughter of Hertha Ayrton!!!

It is perhaps ironic to be hymning wander-thirst when I've hardly been out for such ages and have no particular intentions of venturing forth in the very foreseeable future.

oursin: Photograph of Stella Gibbons, overwritten IM IN UR WOODSHED SEEING SOMETHIN NASTY (woodshed)

I don't know if anybody else has been noticing the reviews of the recent biography of Monica Jones, 'girlfriend of the more famous Philip Larkin' for many years in a very strange and rather horrible relationship.

Rachel Cooke, Monica Jones, Philip Larkin and Me review – a woman under the influence

Blake Morrison, Monica Jones, Philip Larkin and Me by John Sutherland review – a poisonous love

(I think there were others but I don't seem to have links.)

And she does not sound a particularly admirable person, but then, I think of what an awful time for being a woman who wanted a career and a life of mind she was stuck in. Much worse than the 20s/30s, in which, not only was there the sense that the world was opening up for women post-suffrage, Sex Disqualification Removal Act, etc, but also, the get-out clause that, 'she could have married but he was killed on the Somme/she visits him every week in the asylum which is treating his shell-shock but he still doesn't recognise her'. This didn't pertain in the 50s which was far more pathologising about women who did not marry, and do so at an increasingly early age.

One may suppose that she did not, perchance, actually want to marry and dwindle into a wife, quite apart from any problems that the requirements of a husband's career would have posed to hers. I have noted, in the biographies of other women of the period, who did not have the option of settling down with a nice woman (and even the ones who were bi or lesbian tended to be influenced by the homophobia of the times), such expedients as long-term affairs with married men or men like Larkin who had commitment issues, or relationships with men who were bi/gay. (Cf the recent bio of Barbara Pym.)

Which was not necessarily, 'poor things, wasting the best years of their lives when they could have been having hubby and babbiez', but as - possibly not entirely consciously? - a way to have an emotional/sexual life without all that marriage at the period comprised for a woman.

Okay, her internalised misogyny strikes fairly appallingly, but I suspect that was also par for the course at the time, and the being Not Like Other Gurlz, to the point of loathing women writers (WOT she hate George Eliot??!!) and specialising in two particularly stodgy bloke writers. Not even authors noted for their sympathetic and subtle depictions of women, or romantic allure.

Did not have women friends - were there no other women academics at Uni of Leics in other depts whom she would not have seen as competitors?

The sheer awfulness of 50s bro literary culture, though K Amis possible a particularly nasty specimen.

oursin: George Beresford photograph of Marie of Roumania, overwritten 'And I AM Marie of Roumania' (Marie of Roumania)

I can think of plenty of her male contemporaries (including one or two of her fanboys), who were a lot more troubling/troubled, no? (P Larkin, I'm looking at you in particular): This excellent cradle-to-grave biography of a much loved novelist who goes in and out of fashion captures her alarming habits and tormented love affairs. Also, unlike certain esteemed writers of the 1930s, she stayed in the UK and did war service, just saying...

***

If you go down to the woods today - write one book in which a woman gets it on with a bear, and they never let you forget it: First published in the 70s, Marian Engel’s novel about a lonely librarian’s relationship with a bear interrogates boundaries between men and women, humans and animals. Well, yeah, maybe, but I seem to recall somebody pointing out if not immediately at the time, very shortly afterwards, there was a minor flurry of works (especially by Canadian women novelists??? I believe Atwood had one?) in which women Got In Touch with Nature in a very primeval way and Had Epiphanies.

***

I liked this: Dead Women Poets Are Not Your Punchline - there are so many Russ points hit there, in particular the one about women just splurge it all onto the page, men craft it, with a side of women are about their trivial girly issues, men are about the deep recesses of the human heart and its angsty sorrows:

There is an unhinged emotionality tethered to “confessional.” But this is only if you’re not a man. Conroy, Steinbeck, Lowell, Nabokov, Vidal — they’re never “confessional,” only daring and forthright.
***

And Wendy Cope on inventing a struggling male bad poet as a voice to write in:

The book also includes the work of the invented poet Jason Strugnell. His poems are poor imitations of a number of his contemporaries, including Ted Hughes, Seamus Heaney and Craig Raine. He also wrote some Shakespearian sonnets bemoaning his fate as an unpublished bard.

oursin: Painting of Rydale by Barbara Bodichon (Bodichon)

'Why are there no women great artists?' - okay, we know, do we not, my dearios, that there are great women artists? - but there might be more. One of the reasons why there are not as many as there might be could be that they felt they had Other Priorities (not necessarily Being A Muse). I was already apprised of the not necessarily softer side of activists Barbara Bodichon and Sylvia Pankhurst, but I had no idea about Josephine Butler, though possibly one might categorise her as 'talented amateur water-colourist'.

***

I gave a groan of familiarity on reading this:

For Women’s History Month, it has become traditional to rifle through the great names of the past, pluck out a few that strike the imagination and have the appropriate gender marker, and dust them off for a new audience.
The Trowelblazers project, however, suggests:
Stories of pioneering women in the “digging” sciences have been skewed toward those who were White, wealthy, and networked. The TrowelBlazers project aims to reset our imagination—and our future.
Right on sisters, excavate those lesser-known pioneers!

***

Women as mothers of invention: Seven female patent pioneers you should know:

[A] quick caveat. Earlier patents may exist for some of the inventions given in this list but the following women are widely considered the inventor of their ‘thing’ because it worked (earlier versions didn't in some cases), or it was popular, or it is recognisable to the form as it exists today, and so on. It is also worth saying that there are many other female innovators and inventors we could have mentioned. Not all acquired patents, some weren’t given credit, many were trapped by the conditions of their time.
And in some cases doubtless husband/other male relative or associate took the credit...

***

I found it a little Point Thahr Misst in this piece about Virginia Woolf and her relevance to today, that the writer has not encountered, or perhaps not taken on board, Woolf's pertinent critical observation on the subjects that are deemed Important rather than Trivial Subjects for fiction to deal with (men on a battlefield vs women in a drawing room).

***

This Writer Is Tweeting Everything Sylvia Plath Ever Ate - apparently she was quite the foodie. Might we anticipate the Plath Cookery Book? (I'm sure there are other writers, quite apart from the obvious food writers like David, Fisher, Colwin, who resisted the narrative of birdlike appetite and disdain for the pleasures of the table - Lessing springs to mind.)

oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)

National Portrait Gallery to feature more women in its collection: Curators will increase representation of female artists and sitters and seek overlooked stories: yay, I guess? Having been to various exhibitions there on particular groups of women (e.g the Bluestocking circle) and particular artists (Cindy Sherman) either being or making art. A bit miffed - okay, not everybody is entirely au fait with early C20th wymmynz herstry, but Ray Strachey wrote important histories of the suffrage movement: and was secretary to Nancy Astor when she was first woman MP to actually take her seat when she succeeded to her husband's, which (Bulletin of I think I heard this at a conference panel one time) Strachey took on as Her Duty to The Cause, now women were actually in the halls of government.

***

It is also gratifying to see that For the First Time Ever, the Rijksmuseum Will Hang Works by Female Dutch Masters in Its Most Prestigious Gallery:

Finally acknowledging women’s considerable contributions to art history, the museum has hung a trio of paintings by Dutch women artists Judith Leyster (c. 1600–1660), Rachel Ruysch (1664–1750), and Gesina ter Borch (1633–1690) alongside their better-known male counterparts.
....
That visibility has long been denied female artists, who were all-too-often dismissed as amateurs, their accomplishments forgotten after their deaths, and their works frequently misattributed to their husbands, fathers, or male teachers.
***

Also women and art-related: Edmonia Lewis, the first professional African-American sculptor: 'Her father was a free African-American and her mother a Chippewa Indian. Orphaned before she was five, Lewis lived with her mother’s nomadic tribe until she was twelve years old'. Later hung out with the arty boho (and at least partly sapphic) ladies' set in Rome.

***

Was astronomer Caroline Herschel’s success down to extreme politeness? I think the term you mean is 'the deferential behaviour considered appropriate to her gender and status' (compare/contrast the situation of Ada, Countess of Lovelace). I also have a feeling (from other things I've read about Herschel) that what those diaries might have contained was a record she perhaps didn't want kept of familial tensions - the Herschels back home in Hanover had wanted her to stay there as a domestic drudge, and while William had liberated her from that, it was in service to his ambitions in music and astronomy, and his marriage was particularly difficult for her.

***

Amy Levy: A London Poet:

Innovations in public transport offered women greater mobility and independence within the limits of respectability. Levy herself was one of the first to reject the convention that women should travel inside an omnibus, pointing out to her shocked family that she had been accompanied on her initial journey on the top deck by the granddaughter of the Archbishop of Canterbury.
....
Oscar Wilde.... had noticed a promising volume of poetry, Xantippe, and Other Verse (1881), published while she was a student: ‘The modest little paper-covered book, which contains only thirty pages, was published in Cambridge, and was, we believe, never advertised. Its merit, however, attracted a good deal of attention, and the whole edition was sold out.’2 This volume contains a dramatic monologue, ‘Xantippe’, in which Levy voices the despair and fierce grief of Socrates’ wife, a woman known to history only as a scold. Her Xantippe has entered into marriage with a man she saw as a mentor, and is bitterly disappointed to realise that Socrates wanted a submissive wife and not an equal. When Plato, Socrates and Alcibiades contemptuously dismiss her attempt to contribute to their philosophical conversation, she disfigures the white marble of the idealised Hellenic scene in a maenadic frenzy.... In ancient Athens, Xantippe’s lonely rage turns to icy despair and withdrawal. Levy, in 1880s London, could turn to sympathetic peers. She encountered writers and journalists like Eleanor Marx, Clementina Black and Olive Schreiner at the British Museum, a publicly visible space associated with professional labour,
***

An act of resistance that went (perhaps) further than intended: “I wish the old devil was dead”: murder and master-servant relations in the East Midlands.

***

A different servant story: a long life of companionship that seemed to end up producing social advancement: From Downstairs to Upstairs: The story of Ellen Lester.

***

I was distressed to read this: It has been home to literary legends, psychoanalysts and activists, but now residents at the Mary Feilding Guild home in north London have been told they have to leave at the end of May after it changed ownership. I thought I'd posted about this place before, but can't find it.

oursin: Drawing of hedgehog in a cave, writing in a book with a quill pen (Writing hedgehog)

Saying, o, here am I, a lorn lone forgotten old hedjog, no academic demands on my plate -

And I was actually thinking of reviving my old academic blog, as I occasionally do, because there are various things I don't think I'm ever going to turn into Propah Academyk Paperz that I'd quite like to get out there -

So then not only am I reminded of those things for the web project -

- I get asked to referee a journal article Within My Sphere of Expertise -

- and my essay for the edited volume comes back with a general aura of editorial approval but More Wordage to play with to expand various parts, yay!!

***

In other news, partner is now also booked for vaccine!

***

It is probably too late to remind dr rdrz to have their haggis, bashit neeps and champit tatties in the house for tonight if they don't already: but maybe you can at least raise a glass of whisky and toast the Great chieftain o' the pudding-race.

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

What I read

Finished Ellis, Masculinity and Science in Britain, 1831-1918, and makes a case that really, up until the Great War, when the military applications of SCIENCE proved their manly credentials, there was a constant murmur of dubiousness about the proper masculinity of nerdy scientist bods - lurking solitary and speculative, and even if they started to go out into the world and socialise together, somehow were perceived as doin it RONG and probably to attract wymmyn, if not being somehow effeminate themselves... Not to mention in-fighting between different groups of scientists, sometimes on a generational basis.

There was a Literary Review winter double issue.

Months ago I started Chiara Beccalossi's Female Sexual Inversion: Same-Sex Desires in Italian and British Sexology, c. 1870-1920 (2011) (yet another Palgrave Macmillan cybersale item) and put it to one side, and picked it up again. There's quite a lot there generally on medicine and psychiatry and other specialisms and their status in post-Risorgimento Italy - a v different setting to the UK - but anyway, it led to a fairly explicit, if also quite complex (or maybe just confused), discourse on female same-sex desires. Whereas the discourse in British medicine remained evasive and muted: I had a few quibbles (including what I thought was a bit of a misreading of what I was actually doing in one of my articles) with what she was saying on the UK side. I also think one has to ask what would have been the response to Ellis's Sexual Inversion if it hadn't become the subject of a cause celebre prosecution, which was not at all inevitable, and how far the medprof were doing careful dissociation because of that.

I broke off part-way in reading this to re-read Rumer Godden, In This House of Brede (1969), as a result of watching the movie of The Nun's Story (realised that reading the book, many years ago, I did not really consider the whole Belgium/Congo colonialist context! - in particular the old doc at the Tropical Diseases Institute who was 'there in the early days'....). Anyway, this still held up: for one thing, it avoids some of Godden's recurrent tropes, and while there are a few things one might cavil at, it works. (I was wondering about the RC Ethiopians, but apparently there is an Ethiopian Catholic Church as well as the ancient Coptic branch of Christianity practised since Time Immemorial.)

On the go

Well, Susan Chitty, Playing the Game: A Biography of Sir Henry Newbolt (1997) has arrived and I've started it. The copy has a fair amount of underlining and scribbled annotations - ? a review copy. Not entirely taken with the style, but the material is interesting so far.

Up next

No idea. No sign of the things I have on order.

oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)

And continuing my theme of recent years which has been, wars more generally, and this is one of the longer ones -

- which really perhaps I should have noted last year, since there was, at least in my country, a significant battle finally won 100 years previous, except that it was also the bicentenary of Peterloo -

- I was wondering about March of the Women, but while a stirring song set to Ethel Smythe's music, I am not sure the words (by Cicely Hamilton) hold up entirely on their own -

- I give you instead the following, by my gay male suffragist and sex reformer boyfriend, Laurence Housman, Woman This and Woman That.

We observe that it riffs off Kipling's Tommy, which, if not precisely an anti-war poem, is vigorous about the way people turn away from their 'heroes' once the crisis is over... and yes, I was trying to think of poems about the War on Disease, and not coming up with much. Since for reasons I was lately looking up JBS Haldane I was reminded that he wrote a jaunty if somewhat creepy little piece of doggerel, Cancer's A Funny Thing. Maybe the War on Disease is more the province of prose fiction.

We went up to Saint Stephen's with petitions year by year;
'Get out!' the politicians cried, 'We want no women here!'
M.P.s behind the railings stood and laughed to see the fun,
And bold policemen knocked us down, because we would not run.

For it's 'woman this', and 'woman that', and 'Woman, go away!'
But it's 'Share and share alike, ma'am!' when the taxes are to pay;
When the taxes are to pay, my friends, the taxes are to pay,
O it's 'Please to pay up promptly!' when the taxes are to pay.

We went before a magistrate, who would not hear us speak,
To a drunken brute who beat his wife he only gave a week,
But we were sent to Holloway a calendar month or more
Because we dared, against his will, to knock at Asquith's door.

For it's 'woman this', and 'woman that', and 'Woman, wait outside!'
But it's 'Listen to the ladies!' when it suits your party's side;
When it suits your party's side, my friends, with M.P.s on the stump
And shaking in their shoes at how the cat is going to jump!

When women go to work for them the government engage
To give them lots of contract jobs at a low starvation wage,
But when it's men that they employ they always add a note -
'Fair wages must be paid' -- because the men have got the vote.

For it's 'woman this', and 'woman that', and 'Woman, learn your place!'
But it's 'Help us, of your charity!' when trouble looms apace;
When trouble comes apace, my friends, when trouble comes apace,
Then it's 'O, for woman's charity!' to help and save the race!

You dress yourselves in uniforms to guard your native shores,
But those who make the uniforms do work as good as yours;
For the soldier bears the rifle, but the woman bears the race -
And that you' d find no trifle if you had to take her place!

O it's 'woman this', and 'woman that', and 'Woman cannot fight!'
But it's' Ministering Angel!' when the wounded come in sight;
When the wounded come in sight, my friends, the wounded come in sight,
It's a 'ministering angel' then who nurses day and night!

We are only human beings who have wants much like your own,
And if sometimes our conduct isn't all your fancy paints
It wasn't man's example could have turned us into saints!

For it's 'woman here', and 'woman there', and 'Woman on the streets!'
And it's how they look at women with most men that one meets,
With most men that one meets, my friends, with most men that one meets -
It's the way they look at women that keeps women on the streets!

You talk of sanitation, and temperance, and schools,
And you send your male inspectors to impose your man-made rules;
'The woman's sphere's the home,' you say, then prove it to our face:
'Give us the vote that we may make the home a happier place!'

For it's 'woman this', and 'woman that', and Woman, say your say!'
But it's 'What's the woman up to?' when she tries to show the way;
When she tries to show the way, my friends, when she tries to show the way -
And the woman means to show it -- that is why she's out today!
oursin: Text, nits, for picking of, lettered onto image of antique nitcomb from the Science Museum (nitcomb)

I think it's actually a major blooper to write about a modernist poet and his wife's automatic writing and spiritualism more generally in an early C20th/interwar context, and head up your article: In the Victorian era, a different kind of ghostwriting became popular—largely because it allowed men to take all the credit.

I don't know when ye author of the piece thinks the Queen died? Because in the first para she mentions Yeats and his young missus ('Georgie! run, girl, run!') on their honeymoon in 1917.

And goes on to describe various other well post-the Queen Empress's demise mediumistic phenomena.

WOT I say WOT.

I can make a case, along the lines of 'long eighteenth century' for a 'long Victorian era' in certain social and cultural attitudes, but even so, I would not actually describe the 1920s/30s/50s as 'the Victorian era'.

I was also a bit *SIGH* when I read this piece How “A Wrinkle in Time” Changed Sci-Fi Forever (admittedly it is not a book I read in my youth and thus did not have any formative impact on me). But I am always just a little bit irked when I read something like this: 'At the time, science fiction for and by women was a rarity'.

Are we not always, alas, deploring the erasure of the presence of women in the genre going back beyond, well, the last five minutes or so, apart from one or two women who are always the same ones who get cited? The SF Encyclopedia entry for women writers name-checks a number of women working in the field prior to the 1960s, though sometimes under initial or androgynous names.

People - especially perhaps women, since this is often cited as their claim on attention - can be interesting even if they weren't the first or the only.

oursin: Photograph of Stella Gibbons, overwritten IM IN UR WOODSHED SEEING SOMETHIN NASTY (woodshed)

I did not previously realise that poets were meant to fulfill targets, and clearly P Larkin fell down on the goal set for him, and it was Monica Jones' fault?

Sex, lies and despair: unseen letters reveal Larkin's tortured love:

The fact that he wrote so little poetry has been blamed on the stultifying effect of Jones, Sutherland said: “His poetry depends on four slim volumes … Around 100 poems.”

This was a man who had a full-time job as a University Librarian which one understands he performed with due diligence, was running affairs with two other women besides Ms Jones, maintained copious correspondence with his horrible bro mates, kept a diary, wrote a couple of a novels and also quite a lot of unpublished pornography. I think if he'd been moved to write more poems, he might have squeezed in the time.

Not that I think one should judge on this rather peculiar measure. More does not mean better, anymore than massive epic trumps sonnet.

(Do the Muses conduct regular performance reviews and set deliverables?)

While there is always this implication that their relationship drove her to drink, one does rather wonder whether being a woman in academe at that period had significant stresses quite distinct from those of her love-life. In fact, a biography of a woman in that field at that time would be interesting in its own right.

One is, of course, creeped out generally by the suggestion that a woman with whom a bloke in some creative line has some emotional connection is there to be muse or handmaiden: I was reminded of the recent thing about the opening of the TS Eliot/Emily Hale correspondence, and Eliot saying 'o, Vivienne made me suffer, but ART' (and once that's achieved, dump her in a mental institution?). Cf also R Graves and his 'White Goddess'.

oursin: Photograph of small impressionistic metal figurine seated reading a book (Reader)

What I read

Finished In Byron's Wake, which was very good, on the whole, told me stuff about both Lady Byron (nee Annabella Millbanke) and Ada Lovelace that I had not previously known (had not realised what poor health Ada suffered even before her early death), was definitely on Annabella's side even while conceding that she could be a difficult woman (but with her life, who would not be?), and was v readable. My only quibble was that it did not really address the 'did Lord B impose Horrid and at the time Illegal sexual practices upon his wife?' question (the one allusion is ambiguous and could refer to the gossip about Byron's homoerotic leanings): all the discussion about the 'unmentionable' are taken to be about the incest. But Lord B's sexual practices, in and out of the marriage bed, were extensively ventilated in the pseudo-Byronic poem Don Leon (i.e. not a much later construct). Odd.

Also read, Selina Todd, Tastes of Honey: The Making of Shelagh Delaney and a Cultural Revolution (2019). I have oft deplored that biographers of literary figures tend to fall down on matters of their broader historical context: Todd is a historian of class, the 50s, and social mobility and gets this all very well for Delaney - the complex intersections of class, gender, specific time, and particular place, as well as personal background. A whole lot there that I think could also bear looking at alongside other women writers/artists of the period - the move between genres, the working in popular modes that had little critical cred. I was a little surprised - but not necessarily, maybe she wanted motherhood - that Delaney had a child out of wedlock, given that she moved in theatrical/boho circles in which, even pre-67, I am sure there were contacts for reliable abortionists. This was also very readable.

On the go

Still on Ancestral Night and realise that it is some while since I got my teeth into something in sff that wasn't a novella or at least fairly short - this is dense and complex and has intertwining mysteries going on.

Up next

Have a couple of things on pre-order due very shortly.

oursin: Brush the Wandering Hedgehog by the fire (Default)

I thought I had thoughts, but by this state of the day, they have gone. So have a few links.

Clearing out some tabs, which I presumably thought were of interest at the time I saw them:

Bloody capitalism and the cash flow of the menstrual cycle.

Donna Stepan and her family rehabilitate orphaned wombats at their sanctuary in Australia.

NoFap Founder Is Suing a Neuroscientist Who Thinks Masturbating Is Fine.

"Vital Truth is a priceless heritage": Emily Hale narratives released: take that, TS Eliot!

And also on literary heroes behaving badly, Nineteen Eighty-Phwoar: the truth about George Orwell's romantic 'arrangements'. Not altogether unlike those terrible sandalwearing etc progressive types that George was dissing on in The Road to Wigan Pier. Next we shall be finding out he was a secret vegan.

March 2024

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 25th, 2024 05:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios