Oh dear, Margery, point thahr, misst?
Jan. 31st, 2025 07:36 pmYou know, I think by the later 1930s child psychology might have had something to say on this topic, but you just shake your head in bewilderment and look for sociological reasons -
Anyway, I came across this in The Oaken Heart apropos of evacuee children:
One of the oddest of these was this lack of house-training among their children. All young things need house-training. It is one of the jolly reminders that civilisation, like peace, is a reward for effort and not a free gift for a lucky nation. The training of some youngsters takes more effort than others, especially if their general standard of physique is not so good, but these suburban children were uniformly first-class. The whole of Auburn remarked upon it. With very few exceptions the children were fine, fit, rosy and beaming with health, yet the habits of nearly all of them would have disgraced any two-months-old pup.
Margery Allingham ponders on this for a bit and thinks:
After a lot of listening to the main difference between Auburn’s inconveniences and the luxuries of town life a dreadful suspicion came into my mind that it might be that to a certain temperament these new labour-saving devices with which urban homes are crowded might create a situation in which it would be much easier to clean a floor, do unlimited laundry and wipe down the furniture than to train a baby; for it needs more than physical work to teach a child, or indeed any other little animal.
Nowhere does she contemplate the possibility of traumatic regression.
She does note that with the mothers, 'for a certain section of the newcomers the bottom had been knocked clean out of life by their transplantation' but she relates this entirely to the material conveniences of their former lives, and yeah, you might consider it must have been a shock to go from London streets and shops, not to mention what sound like seriously superior child welfare clinics giving them support, to a small rural village.
Okay, I will concede that a lot of work on child development (HAI John Bowlby and Donald Winnicott!) occurred as a result of wartime upheavals and working with evacuees and displaced children but I still think there would have been some concept based on pre-existing studies.
(I'm also wondering about what sort of sanitary facilities were standard in Auburn at the date in question and how they compared with those the urban kids were used to.)